验证 Bash 脚本的参数

我想出了一个基本的方法来帮助自动删除一些不需要的文件夹。

#!/bin/bash
rm -rf ~/myfolder1/$1/anotherfolder
rm -rf ~/myfolder2/$1/yetanotherfolder
rm -rf ~/myfolder3/$1/thisisafolder

这是这样唤起的:

./myscript.sh <{id-number}>

问题是,如果您忘记键入 id-number (正如我刚才所做的),那么它可能会删除很多您确实不想删除的内容。

有没有一种方法可以向命令行参数添加任何形式的验证?在我的例子中,在继续执行脚本之前,最好检查 a)是否有一个参数,b)是否为数值,以及 c)是否存在该文件夹。

198452 次浏览

Use '-z' to test for empty strings and '-d to check for directories.

if [[ -z "$@" ]]; then
echo >&2 "You must supply an argument!"
exit 1
elif [[ ! -d "$@" ]]; then
echo >&2 "$@ is not a valid directory!"
exit 1
fi
#!/bin/sh
die () {
echo >&2 "$@"
exit 1
}


[ "$#" -eq 1 ] || die "1 argument required, $# provided"
echo $1 | grep -E -q '^[0-9]+$' || die "Numeric argument required, $1 provided"


while read dir
do
[ -d "$dir" ] || die "Directory $dir does not exist"
rm -rf "$dir"
done <<EOF
~/myfolder1/$1/anotherfolder
~/myfolder2/$1/yetanotherfolder
~/myfolder3/$1/thisisafolder
EOF

edit: I missed the part about checking if the directories exist at first, so I added that in, completing the script. Also, have addressed issues raised in comments; fixed the regular expression, switched from == to eq.

This should be a portable, POSIX compliant script as far as I can tell; it doesn't use any bashisms, which is actually important because /bin/sh on Ubuntu is actually dash these days, not bash.

Not as bulletproof as the above answer, however still effective:

#!/bin/bash
if [ "$1" = "" ]
then
echo "Usage: $0 <id number to be cleaned up>"
exit
fi


# rm commands go here

The man page for test (man test) provides all available operators you can use as boolean operators in bash. Use those flags in the beginning of your script (or functions) for input validation just like you would in any other programming language. For example:

if [ -z $1 ] ; then
echo "First parameter needed!" && exit 1;
fi


if [ -z $2 ] ; then
echo "Second parameter needed!" && exit 2;
fi

I would use bash's [[:

if [[ ! ("$#" == 1 && $1 =~ ^[0-9]+$ && -d $1) ]]; then
echo 'Please pass a number that corresponds to a directory'
exit 1
fi

I found this faq to be a good source of information.

The sh solution by Brian Campbell, while noble and well executed, has a few problems, so I thought I'd provide my own bash solution.

The problems with the sh one:

  • The tilde in ~/foo doesn't expand to your homedirectory inside heredocs. And neither when it's read by the read statement or quoted in the rm statement. Which means you'll get No such file or directory errors.
  • Forking off grep and such for basic operations is daft. Especially when you're using a crappy shell to avoid the "heavy" weight of bash.
  • I also noticed a few quoting issues, for instance around a parameter expansion in his echo.
  • While rare, the solution cannot cope with filenames that contain newlines. (Almost no solution in sh can cope with them - which is why I almost always prefer bash, it's far more bulletproof & harder to exploit when used well).

While, yes, using /bin/sh for your hashbang means you must avoid bashisms at all costs, you can use all the bashisms you like, even on Ubuntu or whatnot when you're honest and put #!/bin/bash at the top.

So, here's a bash solution that's smaller, cleaner, more transparent, probably "faster", and more bulletproof.

[[ -d $1 && $1 != *[^0-9]* ]] || { echo "Invalid input." >&2; exit 1; }
rm -rf ~/foo/"$1"/bar ...
  1. Notice the quotes around $1 in the rm statement!
  2. The -d check will also fail if $1 is empty, so that's two checks in one.
  3. I avoided regular expressions for a reason. If you must use =~ in bash, you should be putting the regular expression in a variable. In any case, globs like mine are always preferable and supported in far more bash versions.

You can validate point a and b compactly by doing something like the following:

#!/bin/sh
MYVAL=$(echo ${1} | awk '/^[0-9]+$/')
MYVAL=${MYVAL:?"Usage - testparms <number>"}
echo ${MYVAL}

Which gives us ...

$ ./testparams.sh
Usage - testparms <number>


$ ./testparams.sh 1234
1234


$ ./testparams.sh abcd
Usage - testparms <number>

This method should work fine in sh.

Use set -u which will cause any unset argument reference to immediately fail the script.

Please, see the article: Writing Robust Bash Shell Scripts - David Pashley.com.

Old post but I figured i could contribute anyway.

A script is arguably not necessary and with some tolerance to wild cards could be carried out from the command line.

  1. wild anywhere matching. Lets remove any occurrence of sub "folder"

    $ rm -rf ~/*/folder/*
    
  2. Shell iterated. Lets remove the specific pre and post folders with one line

    $ rm -rf ~/foo{1,2,3}/folder/{ab,cd,ef}
    
  3. Shell iterated + var (BASH tested).

    $ var=bar rm -rf ~/foo{1,2,3}/${var}/{ab,cd,ef}
    

one liner Bash argument validation, with and without directory validation

Here are some methods that have worked for me. You can use them in either the global script namespace (if in the global namespace, you can't reference the function builtin variables)

quick and dirty one liner

: ${1?' You forgot to supply a directory name'}

output:

./my_script: line 279: 1: You forgot to supply a directory name

Fancier - supply function name and usage

${1? ERROR Function: ${FUNCNAME[0]}() Usage: " ${FUNCNAME[0]} directory_name"}

output:

./my_script: line 288: 1:  ERROR Function: deleteFolders() Usage:  deleteFolders directory_name

Add complex validation logic without cluttering your current function

Add the following line within the function or script that receives the argument.

: ${1?'forgot to supply a directory name'} && validate $1 || die 'Please supply a valid directory'

You can then create a validation function that does something like

validate() {


#validate input and  & return 1 if failed, 0 if succeed
if [[ ! -d "$1" ]]; then
return 1
fi
}

and a die function that aborts the script on failure

die() { echo "$*" 1>&2 ; exit 1; }

For additional arguments, just add an additional line, replicating the format.

: ${1?' You forgot to supply the first argument'}
: ${2?' You forgot to supply the second argument'}