如何在 MacOS 上诊断 Docker 的原因,特别是使用100% CPU 的 com.docker.hyperkit
?
Docker 统计数据显示所有运行的容器都具有较低的 CPU、内存、净 IO 和块 IO。
Iosnoop 显示,com.docker.hyperkit
每秒执行约50次写入操作,总计每秒500KB 写入文件 Docker.qcow2
。根据 什么是 Docker qCow2?,Docker.qcow2
是一个稀疏文件,它是所有 Docker 容器的持久存储。
在我的例子中,文件并没有那么稀疏,物理大小与逻辑大小相匹配。
Dtruss sudo dtruss -p $DOCKER_PID
显示了大量的 psynch_cvsignal
和 psynch_cvwait
调用。
psynch_cvsignal(0x7F9946002408, 0x4EA701004EA70200, 0x4EA70100) = 257 0
psynch_mutexdrop(0x7F9946002318, 0x5554700, 0x5554700) = 0 0
psynch_mutexwait(0x7F9946002318, 0x5554702, 0x5554600) = 89474819 0
psynch_cvsignal(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8095004C809600, 0x4C809300) = 257 0
psynch_cvwait(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8095014C809600, 0x4C809300) = 0 0
psynch_cvwait(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8096014C809700, 0x4C809600) = -1 Err#316
psynch_cvsignal(0x7F9946002408, 0x4EA702004EA70300, 0x4EA70200) = 257 0
psynch_cvwait(0x7F9946002408, 0x4EA702014EA70300, 0x4EA70200) = 0 0
psynch_cvsignal(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8097004C809800, 0x4C809600) = 257 0
psynch_cvwait(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8097014C809800, 0x4C809600) = 0 0
psynch_cvwait(0x10BF7B470, 0x4C8098014C809900, 0x4C809800) = -1 Err#316
top
来自 https://stackoverflow.com/a/58293240/30900:
docker run -it --rm --pid host busybox top
Docker 嵌入式主机的 CPU 使用率约为3% 。我的 MacBook 的 CPU 使用率是100% 。因此,docker 嵌入式主机并没有导致 CPU 使用量激增。
来自 dtrace 脚本的堆栈跟踪如下所示: https://stackoverflow.com/a/58293035/30900。
这些内核堆栈痕迹看起来无害。
AppleIntelLpssGspi`AppleIntelLpssGspi::regRead(unsigned int)+0x1f
AppleIntelLpssGspi`AppleIntelLpssGspi::transferMmioDuplexMulti(void*, void*, unsigned long long, unsigned int)+0x91
AppleIntelLpssSpiController`AppleIntelLpssSpiController::transferDataMmioDuplexMulti(void*, void*, unsigned int, unsigned int)+0xb2
AppleIntelLpssSpiController`AppleIntelLpssSpiController::_transferDataSubr(AppleInfoLpssSpiControllerTransferDataRequest*)+0x5bc
AppleIntelLpssSpiController`AppleIntelLpssSpiController::_transferData(AppleInfoLpssSpiControllerTransferDataRequest*)+0x24f
kernel`IOCommandGate::runAction(int (*)(OSObject*, void*, void*, void*, void*), void*, void*, void*, void*)+0x138
AppleIntelLpssSpiController`AppleIntelLpssSpiDevice::transferData(IOMemoryDescriptor*, void*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, IOMemoryDescriptor*, void*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, unsigned int, AppleIntelSPICompletion*)+0x151
AppleHSSPISupport`AppleHSSPIController::transferData(IOMemoryDescriptor*, void*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, IOMemoryDescriptor*, void*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long, unsigned int, AppleIntelSPICompletion*)+0xcc
AppleHSSPISupport`AppleHSSPIController::doSPITransfer(bool, AppleHSSPITransferRetryReason*)+0x97
AppleHSSPISupport`AppleHSSPIController::InterruptOccurred(IOInterruptEventSource*, int)+0xf8
kernel`IOInterruptEventSource::checkForWork()+0x13c
kernel`IOWorkLoop::runEventSources()+0x1e2
kernel`IOWorkLoop::threadMain()+0x2c
kernel`call_continuation+0x2e
53
kernel`waitq_wakeup64_thread+0xa7
pthread`__psynch_cvsignal+0x495
pthread`_psynch_cvsignal+0x28
kernel`psynch_cvsignal+0x38
kernel`unix_syscall64+0x27d
kernel`hndl_unix_scall64+0x16
60
kernel`hndl_mdep_scall64+0x4
113
kernel`ml_set_interrupts_enabled+0x19
524
kernel`ml_set_interrupts_enabled+0x19
kernel`hndl_mdep_scall64+0x10
5890
kernel`machine_idle+0x2f8
kernel`call_continuation+0x2e
43395
用户空间中最常见的超过17秒的堆栈跟踪显然与 com.docker.hyperkit 有关。在17秒内有1365个堆栈跟踪,其中 com.docker.hyperkit
创建了平均每秒80个线程的线程。
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd20db+0x19f9
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbdb98c+0x157
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbf6c2d+0x4bd
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_body+0x7e
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start+0x42
libsystem_pthread.dylib`thread_start+0xd
19
Hypervisor`hv_vmx_vcpu_read_vmcs+0x1
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd4c4f+0x2a
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd20db+0x174a
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbdb98c+0x157
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbf6c2d+0x4bd
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_body+0x7e
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start+0x42
libsystem_pthread.dylib`thread_start+0xd
22
Hypervisor`hv_vmx_vcpu_read_vmcs
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbdb98c+0x157
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbf6c2d+0x4bd
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_body+0x7e
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start+0x42
libsystem_pthread.dylib`thread_start+0xd
34
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd878d+0x36
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd20db+0x42f
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbdb98c+0x157
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbf6c2d+0x4bd
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_body+0x7e
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start+0x42
libsystem_pthread.dylib`thread_start+0xd
47
Hypervisor`hv_vcpu_run+0xd
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbd20db+0x6b6
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbdb98c+0x157
com.docker.hyperkit`0x000000010cbf6c2d+0x4bd
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_body+0x7e
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start+0x42
libsystem_pthread.dylib`thread_start+0xd
135
Github-docker/for-mac: com.docker.hyperkit 100% 的 CPU 使用率又回来了 # 3499 . One comment suggests adding volume caching described here: https://www.docker.com/blog/user-guided-caching-in-docker-for-mac/. I tried this and got a small ~10% reduction in CPU usage.