“ const auto”有什么含义吗?

我想问题已经很清楚了。将 auto关键字自动检测常量,或总是返回一个非常量类型,即使有两个版本的函数(一个返回 const,另一个不返回)。

顺便说一句,我确实在 for 循环之前使用了 const auto end = some_container.end(),但我不知道这是否必要,甚至不同于正常的 auto

83006 次浏览

Maybe you are confusing const_iterator and const iterator. The first one iterates over const elements, the second one cannot iterate at all because you cannot use operators ++ and -- on it.

Note that you very seldom iterate from the container.end(). Usually you will use:

const auto end = container.end();
for (auto i = container.begin(); i != end; ++i) { ... }

Consider you have two templates:

template<class U> void f1( U& u );       // 1
template<class U> void f2( const U& u ); // 2

auto will deduce type and the variable will have the same type as the parameter u (as in the // 1 case), const auto will make variable the same type as the parameter u has in the // 2 case. So const auto just force const qualifier.

const auto x = expr;

differs from

auto x = expr;

as

const X x = expr;

differs from

X x = expr;

So use const auto and const auto& a lot, just like you would if you didn't have auto.

Overload resolution is not affected by return type: const or no const on the lvalue x does not affect what functions are called in expr.

Compiler deduces the type for the auto qualifier. If a deduced type is some_type, const auto will be converted to const some_type. However, a good compiler will examine the whole scope of auto variable and find if the value of it changes anywhere. If not, compiler itself will deduce type like this: auto -> const some_type. I've tried this in Visual studio express 2012 and machine code produced is the same in both cases, I'm not sure that each and every compiler will do that. But, it is a good practice to use const auto for three reasons:

  • Preventing coding errors. You intended for this variable not to change but somehow somewhere in its scope, it is changed.
  • Code readability is improved.
  • You help the compiler if for some reason it doesn't deduce const for auto.