Use the key word WITHonce at the top. If any of your Common Table Expressions (CTE) are recursive (rCTE) you have to add the keyword RECURSIVE at the top once also, even if not all CTEs are recursive:
WITH RECURSIVE
cte1 AS (...) -- can still be non-recursive
, cte2 AS (SELECT ...
UNION ALL
SELECT ...) -- recursive term
, cte3 AS (...)
SELECT ... FROM cte3 WHERE ...
If RECURSIVE is specified, it allows a SELECT subquery to
reference itself by name.
Bold emphasis mine. And, even more insightful:
Another effect of RECURSIVE is that WITH queries need not be ordered:
a query can reference another one that is later in the list. (However,
circular references, or mutual recursion, are not implemented.)
Without RECURSIVE, WITH queries can only reference sibling WITH
queries that are earlier in the WITH list.
Bold emphasis mine again. Meaning that the order of WITH clauses is meaningless when the RECURSIVE key word has been used.
BTW, since cte1 and cte2 in the example are not referenced in the outer SELECT and are plain SELECT commands themselves (no collateral effects), they are never executed (unless referenced in cte3).
Problem Reason: Here, you don't have to use multiple WITH clause for combine Multiple CTE.
Solution: It is possible to create the Multiple Common Table Expression's using single WITH clause in SQL. The two different CTE's are created using Single WITH Clause and this is separated by comma to create multiple CTE's.
Sample Multiple CTE's using single
With EmpCount1(DeptName,TotalEmployees)
as
(
Select DeptName, COUNT(*) as TotalEmployees
from Tbl_EmpDetails
join Tbl_Dept Dept
on Tbl_EmpDetails.DeptId = Dept.DeptId
WHERE DeptName IN ('BI','DOTNET')
group by DeptName
),
EmpCount2(DeptName,TotalEmployees)
as
(
Select DeptName, COUNT(*) as TotalEmployees
from Tbl_EmpDetails
join Tbl_Dept Dept
on Tbl_EmpDetails.DeptId = Dept.DeptId
WHERE DeptName IN ('JAVA','AI')
group by DeptName
)
Select * from EmpCount1
UNION
Select * from EmpCount2
This is sample syntax for creating multiple Common Table Expression's with a single With Clause.
As the accepted answer correctly says, the with clause is used only once per a CTE chain. However, for sake of completeness, I would like to add it does not stop you from nesting CTEs.
If cte2 uses cte1, cte3 uses cte2 etc., then the dependency chain between CTEs is linear and it is expressed as with with 3 CTEs. On the contrary, if cte2 doesn't need cte1 and both are needed only in cte3 it should be considered to nest them under definition of cte3 (with cte3 as (with cte1 as (...), cte2 as (...) select...)).
The syntax of CTEs then reflects the dependency tree between CTEs and literally visualizes the scope of partial datasets which can improve readability and prevents scope leakage bugs. Not all db vendors support it but Postgres does.
with cte1(id,capital) as (
values(1,'Prague'),(2,'Bratislava')
), cte2(id,code) as (
with cte2inner1(id,code) as (
values(1,'CZ'),(2,'SK')
), cte2inner2(id,country) as (
values(1,'Czech Republic'),(2,'Slovakia')
)
select id,country from cte2inner1 join cte2inner2 using (id)
)
select *
from cte1 join cte2 using (id)
--join cte2inner1 not possible here