如何检查程序是否使用调试符号编译？

我想在 GIMP 中跟踪一些代码，因此需要启用调试符号的 GIMP。我不记得在编译期间是否启用了它们。如何在不重新编译程序的情况下检查它？

101100 次浏览
小开
最佳答案

You can use file and objdump on Linux. In particular, you can look at whether file says "stripped" or "not stripped" (under my Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, whether an executable is compiled with -g or not shows not stripped with file command. But the one with -g, shows with debug_info, in addition to that), and whether objdump --syms outputs anything useful (for me, it says "no symbols" for a regular build).

小开

When running the objdump --syms command, I see much more than "no symbols" in the output (at least, for kernel objects).

To check if there's debug info inside the kernel object, you can add the following at the end of the objdump command: | grep debug.

If this string is found, you know the kernel object contains debug information. If not, then it's a "clean" kernel object.

Example of a kernel module I've compiled without debug information:

geertvc@jimi:~/mystuff/kernels/linux-3.12.6$ objdump --syms ./modules/lib/modules/3.12.6/kernel/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.ko | grep debug

Example of that same kernel module I've compiled with debug information:

geertvc@jimi:~/mystuff/kernels/linux-3.12.6$ objdump --syms ./modules/lib/modules/3.12.6/kernel/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.ko | grep debug
00000000 l    d  .debug_frame   00000000 .debug_frame
00000000 l    d  .debug_info    00000000 .debug_info
00000000 l    d  .debug_abbrev  00000000 .debug_abbrev
00000000 l    d  .debug_loc     00000000 .debug_loc
00000000 l    d  .debug_aranges 00000000 .debug_aranges
00000000 l    d  .debug_ranges  00000000 .debug_ranges
00000000 l    d  .debug_line    00000000 .debug_line
00000000 l    d  .debug_str     00000000 .debug_str
00000010 l       .debug_frame   00000000 $d

As you can see, the first output returns nothing, while the second output returns lines with debug in it.

Note: in my case, the file command returned me "not stripped" in both debug and non-debug case. However, the difference in size of the kernel object was remarkable:

  • approx. 16k without debug information
  • approx. 137k with debug information

Clearly, the latter version had debug information inside.

My question: is the file command reliable in such cases? From what I've experienced, I rely on the objdump --syms ... | grep debug command.


提交答案