如何关闭 gcc 编译器最佳化以启用缓冲区溢出

Try the -fno-stack-protector flag.

I won't quote the entire page but the whole manual on optimisation is available here: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.3/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Optimize-Options

From the sounds of it you want at least -O0, the default, and:

-fmudflap -fmudflapth -fmudflapir

For front-ends that support it (C and C++), instrument all risky pointer/array dereferencing operations, some standard library string/heap functions, and some other associated constructs with range/validity tests. Modules so instrumented should be immune to buffer overflows, invalid heap use, and some other classes of C/C++ programming errors. The instrumentation relies on a separate runtime library (libmudflap), which will be linked into a program if -fmudflap is given at link time. Run-time behavior of the instrumented program is controlled by the MUDFLAP_OPTIONS environment variable. See env MUDFLAP_OPTIONS=-help a.out for its options.

That's a good problem. In order to solve that problem you will also have to disable ASLR otherwise the address of g() will be unpredictable.

Disable ASLR:

sudo bash -c 'echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space'

Disable canaries:

gcc overflow.c -o overflow -fno-stack-protector

After canaries and ASLR are disabled it should be a straight forward attack like the ones described in Smashing the Stack for Fun and Profit

Here is a list of security features used in ubuntu: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Security/Features You don't have to worry about NX bits, the address of g() will always be in a executable region of memory because it is within the TEXT memory segment. NX bits only come into play if you are trying to execute shellcode on the stack or heap, which is not required for this assignment.

Now go and clobber that EIP!

Urm, all of the answers so far have been wrong with Rook's answer being correct.

Entering:

echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space

Followed by:

gcc -fno-stack-protector -z execstack -o bug bug.c

Disables ASLR, SSP/Propolice and Ubuntu's NoneXec (which was placed in 9.10, and fairly simple to work around see the mprotect(2) technique to map pages as executable and jmp) should help a little, however these "security features" are by no means infallible. Without the `-z execstack' flag, pages have non-executable stack markings.

You don't need to disable ASLR in order to do a buffer overflow! Although ASLR is enabled (kernel_randomize_va_space = 2), it will not take effect unless the compiled executable is PIE. So unless you compiled your file with -fPIC -pie flag, ASLR will not take effect.

I think only disabling the canaries with -fno-stack-protector is enough. If you want to check if ASLR is working or not (Position independent code must be set), use:

hardening-check executable_name

On newer distros (as of 2016), it seems that PIE is enabled by default so you will need to disable it explicitly when compiling.

Here's a little summary of commands which can be helpful when playing locally with buffer overflow exercises in general:

Disable canary:

gcc vuln.c -o vuln_disable_canary -fno-stack-protector

Disable DEP:

gcc vuln.c -o vuln_disable_dep -z execstack

Disable PIE:

gcc vuln.c -o vuln_disable_pie -no-pie

Disable all of protection mechanisms listed above (warning: for local testing only):

gcc vuln.c -o vuln_disable_all -fno-stack-protector -z execstack -no-pie

For 32-bit machines, you'll need to add the -m32 parameter as well.