在 Ruby 中将键/值对附加到具有 < < 的 hash

No, I don't think you can append key/value pairs. The only thing closest that I am aware of is using the store method:

h = {}
h.store("key", "value")

Perhaps you want Hash#merge ?

1.9.3p194 :015 > h={}
=> {}
1.9.3p194 :016 > h.merge(:key => 'bar')
=> {:key=>"bar"}
1.9.3p194 :017 >

If you want to change the array in place use merge!

1.9.3p194 :016 > h.merge!(:key => 'bar')
=> {:key=>"bar"}

There is merge!.

h = {}
h.merge!(key: "bar")
# => {:key=>"bar"}

Since hashes aren't inherently ordered, there isn't a notion of appending. Ruby hashes since 1.9 maintain insertion order, however. Here are the ways to add new key/value pairs.

The simplest solution is

h[:key] = "bar"

If you want a method, use store:

h.store(:key, "bar")

If you really, really want to use a "shovel" operator (<<), it is actually appending to the value of the hash as an array, and you must specify the key:

h[:key] << "bar"

The above only works when the key exists. To append a new key, you have to initialize the hash with a default value, which you can do like this:

h = Hash.new {|h, k| h[k] = ''}
h[:key] << "bar"

You may be tempted to monkey patch Hash to include a shovel operator that works in the way you've written:

class Hash
def <<(k,v)
self.store(k,v)
end
end

However, this doesn't inherit the "syntactic sugar" applied to the shovel operator in other contexts:

h << :key, "bar" #doesn't work
h.<< :key, "bar" #works

I had to do a similar thing but I needed to add values with same keys. When I use merge or update I can't push values with same keys. So I had to use array of hashes.

    my_hash_static = {:header =>{:company => 'xx', :usercode => 'xx', :password => 'xx',
:type=> 'n:n', :msgheader => from}, :body=>[]}
my_hash_dynamic = {:mp=>{:msg=>message, :no=>phones} }
my_hash_full = my_hash_static[:body].push my_hash_dynamic

Similar as they are, merge! and store treat existing hashes differently depending on keynames, and will therefore affect your preference. Other than that from a syntax standpoint, merge!'s key: "value" syntax closely matches up against JavaScript and Python. I've always hated comma-separating key-value pairs, personally.

hash = {}
hash.merge!(key: "value")
hash.merge!(:key => "value")
puts hash

{:key=>"value"}

hash = {}
hash.store(:key, "value")
hash.store("key", "value")
puts hash

{:key=>"value", "key"=>"value"}

To get the shovel operator << working, I would advise using Mark Thomas's answer.