(Wasn't sure if this should go on SU... migration is certainly an option, but more programmers read questions here, so here goes).
I am running Mac OS X 10.8.4, and I have Apple's JDK 1.6.0_51 installed as well as Oracle's JDK 1.7.0_25. I recently installed Oracle's 1.8 preview JDK for some pre-release software that requires it. Now, when I run /usr/libexec/java_home, I get this:
$ /usr/libexec/java_home -V
Matching Java Virtual Machines (4):
1.8.0, x86_64: "Java SE 8" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home
1.7.0_25, x86_64: "Java SE 7" /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_25.jdk/Contents/Home
1.6.0_51-b11-457, x86_64: "Java SE 6" /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
1.6.0_51-b11-457, i386: "Java SE 6" /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home
Great.
However, running:
$ java -version
Returns:
java version "1.8.0-ea"
That means that the default version of Java is currently the pre-release version, which breaks some "normal" packages (in my case, VisualVM).
I can't set JAVA_HOME
because launching applications ignores environment variables, even when launching from the command line (e.g. $ open /Applications/VisualVM.app
).
So, is there a file I can edit where I can set my JVM ordering preferences globally?
(Please don't tell me to launch the Java Preferences Panel because that simply does not work: it does not contain anything useful and only lists one of the 4 JVMs that I have installed.)
Update:
Oracle JVMs live in /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines
. Re-naming the JDK 1.8 directory to jdk1.8.0.jvm.xyz
does not change anything: java_home
still finds it in the right place, and running /usr/bin/java still executes the 1.8 JVM. This is not an issue with synlinks, etc.
Answers to Similar Questions
While this answer offers what amounts to a hack that will remove versions of Java from being picked up by java_home, it still does not answer this question of how java_home chooses its default and whether or not users can non-destructively set it.