Android: 如何处理按钮点击

由于在非 Java 和非 Android 领域有丰富的经验,我正在学习 Android。

我对不同的领域有很多困惑,其中之一就是如何处理按钮点击。至少有4种方法可以做到这一点(! ! !),它们被简要列出 给你

为了保持一致,我将列出以下几点:

  1. 在活动中有一个 View.OnClickListener类的成员,并将其分配给一个实例,该实例将处理 onCreate活动方法中的 onClick逻辑。

  2. 在‘ onCreate’活动方法中创建‘ onClickListener’,并使用 setOnClickListener 将其分配给按钮

  3. 在活动本身中实现“ onClickListener”,并将“ this”分配为按钮的监听器。如果活动只有几个按钮,那么应该分析按钮 ID 来执行适当按钮的“ onClick”处理程序

  4. 对实现‘ onClick’逻辑的活动使用公共方法,并将其分配给活动 xml 声明中的按钮

问题一:

这些都是方法吗,还有别的选择吗? (我不需要别的,只是好奇)

对我来说,最直观的方法就是最新的方法: 它需要输入的代码最少,而且最易读(至少对我来说)。

尽管如此,我并没有看到这种方法被广泛使用。使用它的缺点是什么?

问题二:

这些方法的优缺点是什么? 请分享你的经验或者一个好的链接。

欢迎任何反馈!

另外,我曾经尝试在谷歌上搜索这个话题,但是我找到的只是描述“如何”做到这一点,而不是为什么它是好的或坏的。

292256 次浏览

Question#1 - These are the only way to handle view clicks.

Question#2 -
Option#1/Option#4 - There's not much difference between option#1 and option#4. The only difference I see is in one case activity is implementing the OnClickListener, whereas, in the other case, there'd be an anonymous implementation.

Option#2 - In this method an anonymous class will be generated. This method is a bit cumborsome, as, you'd need to do it multiple times, if you have multiple buttons. For Anonymous classes, you have to be careful for handling memory leaks.

Option#3 - Though, this is a easy way. Usually, Programmers try not to use any method until they write it, and hence this method is not widely used. You'd see mostly people use Option#4. Because it is cleaner in term of code.

#1 I use the last one frequently when having buttons on the layout which are not generated (but static obviously).

If you use it in practice and in a business application, pay extra attention here, because when you use source obfuscater like ProGuard, you'll need to mark these methods in your activity as to not be obfuscated.

For archiving some kind of compile-time-security with this approach, have a look at Android Lint (example).


#2 Pros and cons for all methods are almost the same and the lesson should be:

Use what ever is most appropriate or feels most intuitive to you.

If you have to assign the same OnClickListener to multiple button instances, save it in the class-scope (#1). If you need a simple listener for a Button, make an anonymous implementation:

button.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
@Override
public void onClick(View view) {
// Take action.
}
});

I tend to not implement the OnClickListener in the activity, this gets a little confusing from time to time (especially when you implement multiple other event-handlers and nobody knows what this is all doing).

Option 1 and 2 involves using inner class that will make the code kind of clutter. Option 2 is sort of messy because there will be one listener for every button. If you have small number of button, this is okay. For option 4 I think this will be harder to debug as you will have to go back and fourth the xml and java code. I personally use option 3 when I have to handle multiple button clicks.

Most used way is, anonymous declaration

    Button send = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonSend);
send.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
// handle click
}
});

Also you can create View.OnClickListener object and set it to button later, but you still need to override onClick method for example

View.OnClickListener listener = new View.OnClickListener(){
@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
// handle click
}
}
Button send = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonSend);
send.setOnClickListener(listener);

When your activity implements OnClickListener interface you must override onClick(View v) method on activity level. Then you can assing this activity as listener to button, because it already implements interface and overrides the onClick() method

public class MyActivity extends Activity implements View.OnClickListener{




@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
// handle click
}




@Override
public void onCreate(Bundle b) {
Button send = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonSend);
send.setOnClickListener(this);
}


}

(imho) 4-th approach used when multiple buttons have same handler, and you can declare one method in activity class and assign this method to multiple buttons in xml layout, also you can create one method for one button, but in this case I prefer to declare handlers inside activity class.

Question 1: Unfortunately the one in which you you say is most intuitive is the least used in Android. As I understand, you should separate your UI (XML) and computational functionality (Java Class Files). It also makes for easier debugging. It is actually a lot easier to read this way and think about Android imo.

Question 2: I believe the two mainly used are #2 and #3. I will use a Button clickButton as an example.

2

is in the form of an anonymous class.

Button clickButton = (Button) findViewById(R.id.clickButton);
clickButton.setOnClickListener( new OnClickListener() {
            

@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
***Do what you want with the click here***
}
});

This is my favorite as it has the onClick method right next to where the button variable was set with the findViewById. It seems very neat and tidy that everything that deals with this clickButton Button View is located here.

A con that my coworker comments, is that imagine you have many views that need onclick listener. You can see that your onCreate will get very long in length. So that why he likes to use:

3

Say you have, 5 clickButtons:

Make sure your Activity/Fragment implement OnClickListener

// in OnCreate


Button mClickButton1 = (Button)findViewById(R.id.clickButton1);
mClickButton1.setOnClickListener(this);
Button mClickButton2 = (Button)findViewById(R.id.clickButton2);
mClickButton2.setOnClickListener(this);
Button mClickButton3 = (Button)findViewById(R.id.clickButton3);
mClickButton3.setOnClickListener(this);
Button mClickButton4 = (Button)findViewById(R.id.clickButton4);
mClickButton4.setOnClickListener(this);
Button mClickButton5 = (Button)findViewById(R.id.clickButton5);
mClickButton5.setOnClickListener(this);




// somewhere else in your code


public void onClick(View v) {
switch (v.getId()) {
case  R.id.clickButton1: {
// do something for button 1 click
break;
}


case R.id.clickButton2: {
// do something for button 2 click
break;
}


//.... etc
}
}

This way as my coworker explains is neater in his eyes, as all the onClick computation is handled in one place and not crowding the onCreate method. But the downside I see is, that the:

  1. views themselves,
  2. and any other object that might be located in onCreate used by the onClick method will have to be made into a field.

Let me know if you would like more information. I didn't answer your question fully because it is a pretty long question. And if I find some sites I will expand my answer, right now I'm just giving some experience.

I prefer option 4, but it makes intuitive sense to me because I do far too much work in Grails, Groovy, and JavaFX. "Magic" connections between the view and the controller are common in all. It is important to name the method well:

In the view,add the onClick method to the button or other widget:

    android:clickable="true"
android:onClick="onButtonClickCancel"

Then in the class, handle the method:

public void onButtonClickCancel(View view) {
Toast.makeText(this, "Cancel pressed", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}

Again, name the method clearly, something you should do anyway, and the maintenance becomes second-nature.

One big advantage is that you can write unit tests now for the method. Option 1 can do this, but 2 and 3 are more difficult.

Step 1:Create an XML File:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout
xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:orientation="vertical">


<Button
android:id="@+id/btnClickEvent"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:text="Click Me" />
</LinearLayout>

Step 2:Create MainActivity:

package com.scancode.acutesoft.telephonymanagerapp;


import android.app.Activity;
import android.os.Bundle;
import android.view.View;
import android.widget.Button;


public class MainActivity extends Activity implements View.OnClickListener {


Button btnClickEvent;
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);


btnClickEvent = (Button) findViewById(R.id.btnClickEvent);
btnClickEvent.setOnClickListener(MainActivity.this);


}


@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
//Your Logic
}
}

HappyCoding!

My sample, Tested in Android studio 2.1

Define button in xml layout

<Button
android:id="@+id/btn1"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />

Java pulsation detect

Button clickButton = (Button) findViewById(R.id.btn1);
if (clickButton != null) {
clickButton.setOnClickListener( new View.OnClickListener() {


@Override
public void onClick(View v) {
/***Do what you want with the click here***/
}
});
}

To make things easier asp Question 2 stated, you can make use of lambda method like this to save variable memory and to avoid navigating up and down in your view class

//method 1
findViewById(R.id.buttonSend).setOnClickListener(v -> {
// handle click
});

but if you wish to apply click event to your button at once in a method.

you can make use of Question 3 by @D. Tran answer. But do not forget to implement your view class with View.OnClickListener.

In other to use Question #3 properly

There are also options available in the form of various libraries that can make this process very familiar to people that have used other MVVM frameworks.

https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/data-binding/

Shows an example of an official library, that allows you to bind buttons like this:

<Button
android:text="Start second activity"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:onClick="@{() -> presenter.showList()}"
/>