如何看到 R 的源代码的内部或。原始的功能?

这两个都没有显示 pnorm函数的源代码,

stats:::pnorm
getAnywhere(pnorm)

我怎样才能看到 pnorm的源代码?

sum
(..., na.rm = FALSE)  .Primitive("sum")
.Primitive("sum")
function (..., na.rm = FALSE)  .Primitive("sum")
methods(sum)
no methods were found

如何查看 sum函数的源代码?

27424 次浏览

The R source code of pnorm is:

function (q, mean = 0, sd = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)
.Call(C_pnorm, q, mean, sd, lower.tail, log.p)

So, technically speaking, typing "pnorm" does show you the source code. However, more usefully: The guts of pnorm are coded in C, so the advice in the previous question view source code in R is only peripherally useful (most of it concentrates on functions hidden in namespaces etc.).

Uwe Ligges's article in R news, Accessing the Sources (p. 43), is a good general reference. From that document:

When looking at R source code, sometimes calls to one of the following functions show up: .C(), .Call(), .Fortran(), .External(), or .Internal() and .Primitive(). These functions are calling entry points in compiled code such as shared objects, static libraries or dynamic link libraries. Therefore, it is necessary to look into the sources of the compiled code, if complete understanding of the code is required. ... The first step is to look up the entry point in file ‘$R HOME/src/main/names.c’, if the calling R function is either .Primitive() or .Internal(). This is done in the following example for the code implementing the ‘simple’ R function sum().

(Emphasis added because the precise function you asked about (sum) is covered in Ligges's article.)

Depending on how seriously you want to dig into the code, it may be worth downloading and unpacking the source code as Ligges suggests (for example, then you can use command-line tools such as grep to search through the source code). For more casual inspection, you can view the sources online via the R Subversion server or Winston Chang's github mirror (links here are specifically to src/nmath/pnorm.c). (Guessing the right place to look, src/nmath/pnorm.c, takes some familiarity with the structure of the R source code.)

mean and sum are both implemented in summary.c.

> methods(mean)
[1] mean.data.frame mean.Date       mean.default    mean.difftime   mean.IDate*
[6] mean.POSIXct    mean.POSIXlt    mean.yearmon*   mean.yearqtr*


Non-visible functions are asterisked
> mean.default
function (x, trim = 0, na.rm = FALSE, ...)
{
if (!is.numeric(x) && !is.complex(x) && !is.logical(x)) {
warning("argument is not numeric or logical: returning NA")
return(NA_real_)
}
if (na.rm)
x <- x[!is.na(x)]
if (!is.numeric(trim) || length(trim) != 1L)
stop("'trim' must be numeric of length one")
n <- length(x)
if (trim > 0 && n) {
if (is.complex(x))
stop("trimmed means are not defined for complex data")
if (any(is.na(x)))
return(NA_real_)
if (trim >= 0.5)
return(stats::median(x, na.rm = FALSE))
lo <- floor(n * trim) + 1
hi <- n + 1 - lo
x <- sort.int(x, partial = unique(c(lo, hi)))[lo:hi]
}
.Internal(mean(x))
}
<bytecode: 0x155ef58>
<environment: namespace:base>

I know this post is more that 2 years old, but I thought this might be useful to some users browsing through this question.

I'm basically just copying my answer to this other similar question so that it can maybe prove useful to some R users who want to explore the C source files.

  1. First, with pryr you can use the show_c_source function which will search on GitHub the relevant piece of code in the C source files. Works for .Internal and .Primitive functions.

    body(match.call)
    
    
    # .Internal(match.call(definition, call, expand.dots))
    
    
    pryr::show_c_source(.Internal(match.call(definition, call, expand.dots)))
    

    Which takes you to this page, showing that unique.c contains the function do_matchcall.

  2. I've put together this tab delimited file, building on the names.c file and using find-in-files to determine the location of the source code. There are some functions that have platform-specific files, and a handful of others for which there is more than one file with relevant source code. But for the rest the mapping is pretty well established, at least for the current version (3.1.2).