使用参数模拟构造函数

我有一门课程如下:

public class A {
public A(String test) {
bla bla bla
}


public String check() {
bla bla bla
}
}

构造函数 A(String test)check()中的逻辑正是我试图模拟的内容。我希望任何调用像: new A($$$any string$$$).check()返回一个虚拟字符串 "test"

我试过:

 A a = mock(A.class);
when(a.check()).thenReturn("test");


String test = a.check(); // to this point, everything works. test shows as "tests"


whenNew(A.class).withArguments(Matchers.anyString()).thenReturn(rk);
// also tried:
//whenNew(A.class).withParameterTypes(String.class).withArguments(Matchers.anyString()).thenReturn(rk);


new A("random string").check();  // this doesn't work

但似乎没什么效果。new A($$$any string$$$).check()仍然在执行构造函数逻辑,而不是获取 A的模拟对象。

361177 次浏览

To my knowledge, you can't mock constructors with mockito, only methods. But according to the wiki on the Mockito google code page there is a way to mock the constructor behavior by creating a method in your class which return a new instance of that class. then you can mock out that method. Below is an excerpt directly from the Mockito wiki:

Pattern 1 - using one-line methods for object creation

To use pattern 1 (testing a class called MyClass), you would replace a call like

   Foo foo = new Foo( a, b, c );

with

   Foo foo = makeFoo( a, b, c );

and write a one-line method

   Foo makeFoo( A a, B b, C c ) {
return new Foo( a, b, c );
}

It's important that you don't include any logic in the method; just the one line that creates the object. The reason for this is that the method itself is never going to be unit tested.

When you come to test the class, the object that you test will actually be a Mockito spy, with this method overridden, to return a mock. What you're testing is therefore not the class itself, but a very slightly modified version of it.

Your test class might contain members like

  @Mock private Foo mockFoo;
private MyClass toTest = spy(new MyClass());

Lastly, inside your test method you mock out the call to makeFoo with a line like

  doReturn( mockFoo )
.when( toTest )
.makeFoo( any( A.class ), any( B.class ), any( C.class ));

You can use matchers that are more specific than any() if you want to check the arguments that are passed to the constructor.

If you're just wanting to return a mocked object of your class I think this should work for you. In any case you can read more about mocking object creation here:

http://code.google.com/p/mockito/wiki/MockingObjectCreation

The code you posted works for me with the latest version of Mockito and Powermockito. Maybe you haven't prepared A? Try this:

A.java

public class A {
private final String test;


public A(String test) {
this.test = test;
}


public String check() {
return "checked " + this.test;
}
}

MockA.java

import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;


import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;


@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(A.class)
public class MockA {
@Test
public void test_not_mocked() throws Throwable {
assertThat(new A("random string").check(), equalTo("checked random string"));
}
@Test
public void test_mocked() throws Throwable {
A a = mock(A.class);
when(a.check()).thenReturn("test");
PowerMockito.whenNew(A.class).withArguments(Mockito.anyString()).thenReturn(a);
assertThat(new A("random string").check(), equalTo("test"));
}
}

Both tests should pass with mockito 1.9.0, powermockito 1.4.12 and junit 4.8.2

Without Using Powermock .... See the example below based on Ben Glasser answer since it took me some time to figure it out ..hope that saves some times ...

Original Class :

public class AClazz {


public void updateObject(CClazz cClazzObj) {
log.debug("Bundler set.");
cClazzObj.setBundler(new BClazz(cClazzObj, 10));
}
}

Modified Class :

@Slf4j
public class AClazz {


public void updateObject(CClazz cClazzObj) {
log.debug("Bundler set.");
cClazzObj.setBundler(getBObject(cClazzObj, 10));
}


protected BClazz getBObject(CClazz cClazzObj, int i) {
return new BClazz(cClazzObj, 10);
}
}

Test Class

public class AClazzTest {


@InjectMocks
@Spy
private AClazz aClazzObj;


@Mock
private CClazz cClazzObj;


@Mock
private BClazz bClassObj;


@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
Mockito.doReturn(bClassObj)
.when(aClazzObj)
.getBObject(Mockito.eq(cClazzObj), Mockito.anyInt());
}


@Test
public void testConfigStrategy() {
aClazzObj.updateObject(cClazzObj);


Mockito.verify(cClazzObj, Mockito.times(1)).setBundler(bClassObj);
}
}

Mockito has limitations testing final, static, and private methods.

with jMockit testing library, you can do few stuff very easy and straight-forward as below:

Mock constructor of a java.io.File class:

new MockUp<File>(){
@Mock
public void $init(String pathname){
System.out.println(pathname);
// or do whatever you want
}
};
  • the public constructor name should be replaced with $init
  • arguments and exceptions thrown remains same
  • return type should be defined as void

Mock a static method:

  • remove static from the method mock signature
  • method signature remains same otherwise

With Mockito you can use withSettings(). For example if the CounterService required 2 dependencies, you can pass them as a mock:

 UserService userService = Mockito.mock(UserService.class);
SearchService searchService = Mockito.mock(SearchService.class);
CounterService counterService = Mockito.mock(CounterService.class, withSettings().useConstructor(userService, searchService));

Starting with version 3.5.0 of Mockito and using the InlineMockMaker, you can now mock object constructions:

 try (MockedConstruction mocked = mockConstruction(A.class)) {
A a = new A();
when(a.check()).thenReturn("bar");
}

Inside the try-with-resources construct all object constructions are returning a mock.